Last week I was fortunate enough to take part in a whisky tasting. When I say tasting, I mean more of a pre-meditated binge on single malt, interrupted from time to time by witty banter pertaining to Scotland. Whilst fond of whisky, my taste is still very much at the nursery stage. No, that’s too hopeful. My whiskey knowledge is not only pre-school, but a conceptus, germinating slowly in the womb that is my palate. I feel I’ve ventured onto risky ground speaking of foetuses in conjunction with scotch; never the twain should meet, except in a strictly metaphorical sense. I am, after all, a medical student first and foremost.
As the evening
went on, something occurred to me. In
truth, several things occurred to me; principally that I’d been disguising my
silence with regular drinking, resulting in my relative drunkenness; but there
was something more. Whilst I often could
not articulate the difference between two whiskies in terms of smokey notes,
gravelly undertones, sherry cask strokes and peaty tickles, more often than not
I could taste it. There was a gap between
my experience and my expression of it, before which I was left helpless. Something was evading description.
I’d had this
experience before, albeit on a more profound level and in a more sober
state. Standing before some of the
masterpieces in the Louvre or the National Gallery I’ve been filled with
something deeper than words, deeper than thought. Actually, I have the feeling there were some
thoughts along the lines of ‘move out of the way you knobhead tourist’, but
that was only on the most superficial of levels. In my depths the art had evoked a response
that I could experience and know fully, yet which I could not explain to a
friend who, being a philistine, did not feel the same way.
Are these
unspoken experiences confined to the realms of whisky and visual art? I think not.
It could be argued that every human expression, such as the use of language,
is the child of an internal notion, an idea, or a form. Whilst this internal realm can be affected
from the outside (by art, music, sport…), its complexity can never fully be
expressed or realised by another but ourselves. Perhaps such expression is more
complete in some forms than others; a piece of poetry may more easily be able
to convey the complexity of one’s feelings than a mathematical algorithm, for
instance. This more wholesome form of conveyance
is still however imperfect; in order to be effective, it has to be imperfect.
I am asking
this: what gives rise to all outward expression? What is the ‘inner consent’ that gives birth
to the word ‘yes’, or the inward experience of unrequited love that gives
breath to a sonnet? What form do these pure
feelings or notions or ideals take, if not one of words with their syntax and
grammar? Do the offspring expressions
tell us fully of the parental concepts?
A particularly
pertinent example of this separation between our surface expression and
foundational happenings, is desire. Ask
a man what he wants and he will no doubt reel off one thousand and one needs,
hopes and dreams: an external expression of his hungers. Then ask the same man to try and put his
finger on the basic root of his propulsion towards these things, to try and
understand what it is to want without language
and he is likely to find himself on unchartered waters, unsure even of
what he desires at all. Give it a
go. What is it that you really
want? Even with your most superficial
desires, what is it within you that gives rise to them?
What if Homo sapiens had not developed a
capacity for language; would our internal experience of the world be any
different? It may be worth considering
how much of our lives we pass living in this exterior façade of imperfect
expression without truly connecting with or considering the base level. It seems that language in particular can cloud
what is going on below the surface within us, often being empty and vacuous
rhetoric. Perhaps we should spend more
time trying to come to terms with the powerful currents under the surface
rather than simply paddling in the superficial ripples. Perhaps this is a value of silence that the
world is all too ready to forget.
It seems that this
deeper arena of unsaid giants concerns everything in the human experience: from
basic motive to our knowledge of the world.
What would happen if we were to occasionally bask in the simple beauty
of pure concepts, happy to keep them unsaid?
What if we connected with our core desires that drive our life instead
of being content with shallow wants?
What if we were to sit in the difference between Glenfiddich and
Glenfarclas without saying it, without spelling it out, without caging it? I dare suppose that a life containing such
contemplation would be all the more wholesome for it.
Needless to say,
I was put to bed by 10.

Excellent article, a little like a good malt, one to savour and ponder and...just ponder!
ReplyDelete